PROTECTOR PARTY

Yes – –Defamation harms society. I simply interpret Judaism like many other Christian Jews do, like Jesus & David Suchet [Agatha Christie’s Poirot] who are also not Zionist Jews or Zionist Christians.

 Yes – – –REPETITIVE, expensive, “anti-Semitic” demonisation against honest policy & the warning of Trump’s Zionist Administration, is also harmful, boring and ridiculous.

  •  Should these policies be offered via the Goldstein Federal Ballot?  Would they be whistling in Laodicean wind? Please advise – 0400372947:
  • 1. Excess Wealth Tax for Fairness & Security: Introduce taxes on extremely high net worths democratically defined e.g. $50 – $100 million. 

2. An Informed Citizenry: Televised evening debates for uniting our awareness of the pros and cons of controversial, Official/Prominent views e.g. man-made climate change; ‘virus’ injections; the Great Reset; the Deep State/1%; censorship; Theory or Fact probability that the Few with Excess Wealth can & do, without empathy, control the Many using Centralized Wealth and Concentrated AI power. Icke to be asked to partake.

3. Excess Banking Power: [a] Stop closing Bank and Post branches and establish a public “Australia Post Bank” for fair competition, community access and prevention of banking cartels. [b] Our Federal Treasury to have the sole power to create credit money – oust ludicrous private money creation.

4. Foreign Policy: [a] Free Duggan, Icke and Gazans from evil political prejudice.           [b] Ban foreign control of military bases in Australia to avoid them being targeted.

5. Domestic Manufacturing: Grow our very weak [pathetic?] manufacturing production as we did successfully in the past by protecting it from unfree trade like imported slave-labour products and betrayal of our sovereignty & justice.                                          6. Promote Organic Food: Subsidy support for our organic food  production from tax on imported  food.

7. Immigration: Stop immigration while our births exceed our deaths;  and most importantly, while our wealth per head depends basically on natural resource sales.

8. Local Community Control of Building Heights: Encourage  State governments to empower local councils to determine building height limits in their areas. 

                            Policy Speech & Detail: protectorparty.com

Policy Detail:

*Only if enough of us unite to communicate awareness of urgent policy needed for democratic Control of Excess Wealth, AI Power Concentration and Sovereign Domestic Production, will the Goldstein 2025 Ballot include John Casley the Policy Independent – Mobile 0400372947. {No sense whistling in Laodicean wind!}

  1. Excess Wealth Tax: Excess is defined as “an amount of something that is more than necessary, permitted or desirable”. Net worth is “the value of all assets minus all liabilities”.

We accept as democratic our citizens having High, Medium & Low Net worths; Or having High, Medium & Low  levels of wealth power for material need and for participating in Political Control.  We don’t accept our citizens having excessively Low Net-worths, so our Govt uses taxation via Centrelink and an ‘excess poverty‘ definition from Net worth guidelines, to ensure that they will have at least a Low Net-Worth. Thus many of our citizens are poor, but not excessively poor.

Our Govt doesn’t use taxation and an ‘excess wealth’ definition  to bring citizens with excessively high Net worths  even closer to having acceptable High Net Worths.  So this policy advocates that our Govt employs the wealth tax principles applied in some overseas countries whereby different excess wealth levels are defined and excess wealth taxes are placed on these levels. The effect of this is to lower the tax burden for those citizens below the lowest defined  level of excess wealth; and reduce economic power for Excess Political Control for those citizens above that level.

{Interestingly their remains the question of whether we should or could, tax excess wealth out of existence. This could be a topic for debate under Policy 2.}

2. Information Transparency: Elected politicians supporting this policy would organise televised evening debates on ABC and advertising channels.They would include controversial topics of the day such as; private bank money creation; Zionism; Elite Conspiracy – fact or theory?; Controllers of AI Technology; Man-made Climate Change; censorship; Virus Injections ; 15 minute Cities; mass migration; algorithmic banning – – –

{below are just some facts & opinions suggesting why we may not be getting the full awareness picture}

The Few are quite aware. So are only some of the Many. The Few are excellent at manipulating deception and diverting attention from them. George Carlin said, “It’s a BIG CLUB and you ain’t in it!” [And it ain’t healthy for those who are & ain’t in it.] See Conspiracy.   This Force is often referred to by many citizens as, 1%, Global [Financial] Elite, Global Cult, Zionist, Fascist, Nazi, NWO, Deep State  or similar “1984”, “Big Brother” Orwellian terms. These citizens claim to be Conspiracy Factualists but Media   contemptuously claims they are Conspiracy Theorists.  Questions: Is it time we publicly faced and debated these two claims? Should we debate controversial topics followed by very large numbers of people on TwitterX? Why won’t T.V. publicly debate them with conflicting evidence instead of just having them commented on? Should elected politicians arrange these debates on T.V.? Wouldn’t the debates be both educational and entertaining? Wouldn’t evening T.V. audiences be great for commercial advertising? Why might Media owners not want these debates despite this? Why may they especially not want the controversial David Icke to boost audiences for these debates?  Is it now, politically and frighteningly urgent to do so? Is a completed “1984” arriving?

Should  we debate the topic of  Excess Net worths being part of the Conspiracy Theory/Fact? 
Will we accept Media sneering and silence on this basic issue; and say meekly, “It has always been thus”, “Nothing can be done”, “They give a lot to charity”?  Should we tax Excess Wealth Control out of existence; would anyone be harmed if we did; would all benefit  democratically ? Facts that May Appear in the Debates: [a] Excess Poverty is enormous and increasing; ditto Excess Wealth [b] Middle Class wealth is declining rapidly [c] war & drug [legal & illegal] profits for the few, continue to increase [d] these facts and the following could be by accident or design [e] psychopaths [rich and poor] have no empathy as humanoids [f]i excessively rich psychopaths can grasp more wealth, child body parts & sadistic sexual pleasure  without feeling guilt from causing pain to humans ii the massive increase in child disappearance [g] i the increasing decline in National sovereignty to benefit Centralised sovereignty ii around 1960, Presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy officially spoke of an Elite – “Military Industrial Complex”; “ruthless, monolithic conspiracy”; note Media silence on these famous quotes today [h] the increase in official global threats and demand for Centralised Control [I] i the history of Govt global threats being Government  conspiracy lies e.g. Vietnam’s Yellow Peril, Iraq’s WMD ii from these lies the Few benefitted the Many suffered [j] i National and Global Govt may have stopped lying ii their present Global threats from disease and warming and misinformation-disinformation needing centralised control may not be lies iii no scientific paper shows proof of a Covid19 virus existing iv PM Boris Johnson’s [medically just?] carefree partying  hypocrisy in covid lockdown [k]i Centralised power benefits from One-party States [see Corruption Cartoon] not opposing it e.g. Republican-Democratic, Labor-Liberal bi-partisanship on i Excess Wealth, ii Zionist Israel, iii War Attack [l] the impossibility for democratic control [“by the people”] to exist with excess wealth control for the few [m] i conspirators are mainly secretive but the Many have been brazenly [in your face] told by Klaus Schwab of the WEF elite, “You will own nothing and be happy” ii this has been called ‘selling’ a conspiracy for central control – which is not a lie – because of increasing public awareness [not fast enough yet!], rather than ‘concealing’ it [n] the increase in censorship of free speech e.g. the Misinformation And Disinformation social media censorship bill now stopped –  permanently? – by an aware and united many [o] centrally controlled AI algorithms making even free speech lack free reach [p] centralised private banking has enormous money creation power [q] Centralised private control of banking and digitalized currency by the BIS, a private, unelected, unaccountable & secretive few [r] without any private bank  money creation, i all Australian money would be created by our Treasury based solely on the assets and creativity of our Nation ii banks would only lend their deposits including any borrowings from Treasury, iii inflation would not be caused by private money creation, iv any excess control of banks over Govt would be mitigated [s] Continual war and destruction profiting a few. [t]i Evidence from David Icke’s 30 books ii the centralised insulting and ridiculing of him, then ignoring of him then the insane banning of him from here and 26 European countries iii the silence about this from both MSM and MAM [“alternative” Media] & their refusal to interview him –  exactly of what is he saying  are they frightened or want hidden? He does speak fact and opinion about Elite Power – but so what? iv the past persecution of Julian Assange, now of Daniel Duggan, David Icke & Gazans [u] refusal to hold T.V. formal debates on covid, masks, mandates, lockdowns, blackmails [no jab no job], human-caused climate change, censorship. [v] Blackrock financial power [w] 15 minute cities [x] Dutch farm attack [y] wars, wars wars [z] Secret Societies – – – this global madness goes on and on. Only the inhumane Few and Excess Control benefit. Do the humane Many perceive this or are many of the Many Laodicean? Will centrally controlled global AI perception boom?  Debate and widespread awareness of all this evidence above and more may indicate i, if probability favours coincident or design and ii, if there is urgent need for us to call and vote for immediate action. No more Policy Puppets of the Few!! They are Few, we are Many [8 billion for goodness sake!]. But the Many will never win while voting for policies lacking major substance – perhaps, hopefully more substantial alternative policies will be offered in Goldstein! If not, let’s make these policies sparkle!

  1. Excess Banking Power: Abraham Lincoln & JFK stopped supporting  ludicrous private bank money creation – and were both shot. Credit money is the creation of monetary value through the establishment of debt. In a contrived system brazenly termed by Private Bankers as “Fractional Reserve Banking” – not “Private Money Creation” – commercial banks at present are allowed by Govt to create credit money by issuing loans in greater amounts than the deposits they hold. Private banks to be forbidden to increase the money supply in this way and to their private enrichment. Their claim that an inflation rate [which their credit money increase inflates!] between 2% and 3% is acceptable, is refuted –  complete Treasury control of the money supply would make it nearer to 0%. Any inflation rate whether 3 or 8 percent matters precious little to bankers creating credit money – but it does to those of us forbidden by law to create cash and credit money. If the banks want to lend more money than their deposit structure allows, they may borrow from our Treasury with Treasury approval; and repay their debt with earned money from profit thus enriching our Govt. Our Federal Treasury to be the sole  creator of our monetary value and to be responsible for balancing its supply to meet the needs of our economy and achieving the best inflation rate possible. The benefit of credit money creation by enriching our Treasury would be shared by all Australians. See Bank Rebirth – but a simple analogy may help clarify the absurdity of present “bankster” lending & Lib-Lab support of it: When a truck lender wants to lend more trucks than he has to lend, he can borrow trucks from a truck creator. When his business fails – no Lib-Lab support. When the banks fail – the Lib-Labs bail them out with tax payer money. They [& Policy Timid Independents] fear and serve the banks.  Oust them.
  2. Foreign Policy: [a] i Similar to the Julian Assange case, the Daniel Duggan extradition is a political, not a just legal decision. It is a pandering, brutal response to US Sinophobia, harming an Australian citizen and his large family. United we proudly helped to stop Assange’s persecution regardless of American influence ii see 2. re David Icke & unite to lift our ban on an innocent, aware man – who we allowed to visit and talk-tour our country’s Capital cities, ten times! How greatly informative [and entertaining] he would be in some of our televised awareness debates verbally thrashing certain billionaire people and their policies! Media Elites fear & detest David Icke so won’t publish his Elite evidence, iii unite to stop the persecution and genocide of Gazans [is MS Media with  T.V. telling you each new day’s child death and injury rate?] [b] See Malcom Fraser’s book, “Dangerous Allies”. These allied targets are on our soil now in dangerous times! Our allies can still be allies without this targeting risk if they are true allies.
  3. 5. Domestic Manufacturing: See Constitution.  “No import of slaves or their product”. Benefit of International Trade is  understandably exaggerated by Globalists  whose tactic –  with help from their WTO –  of divide and conquer works better with nations heavily dependent on global trade.  Benefits of less dependency on global trade apart from political independence for sovereign States, include sophistication and social pride [we to be no more basically soil and rock quarriers], reduction of transport costs and imported disease, less national soil nutrient exported plus the moral satisfaction in rejecting slave-wage imports like we reject importation of slaves. With decades of continuing decline of this industry under Lib and Lab policy [Tweedle Dum-Tweedle Dee] it is time for substantial new policy.
  4. 6. Promote Organic Food: See Constitution. “We are what we eat”. Unhealthy [often termed “poisonous”] inputs in food production, i  deteriorates our national health and ii increases our enormous medical costs [but benefits  drug industry wealth control.]  A little light  relief and exaggeration: Despite his many faults, Trump said  “Tariffs is the most beautiful word in the world.” Resource rich America and Australia are indeed well placed for healthy and strong economic protection. We are in an excellent position to feed all our own people  and also many discerning foreigners, with high quality organic food.
  5. 7. Immigration:  Australia’s Standard of Living has fallen as its economic wealth from exported Natural Resources has been divided among more and more because of immigration. 
  6. 8. Local Control of Building: Encourage State government to empower local councils to determine building height limits in their own jolly areas!  The Lib-Labs will oppose this because they do serve the Big End of Town in building construction- see Corruption Cartoon. Remember the Libs sold our Brighton Police Station and the Labs want high rise in Goldstein. On Twitter the present Brighton Lib James Newbury “Here to Help [Me?]”, called my billboard anti-Semitic which pleases his Zionist electors and awaits an honest retraction.   Yes – – oh dear, that repetitive, boring term again. 
  7. Lastly a serious – non-boring –  thought from David Icke/Whitney Webb:  The Kissinger/Eric Schmidt book on AI basically states that the real promise of AI, from their perspective, is as a tool of perception manipulation – that eventually people will not be able to interpret or perceive reality without the help of an AI via cognitive diminishment and learned helplessness.  For that to happen, online reality must become so insane that real people can no longer distinguish real from fake in the virtual realm so that they can then become dependent on certain algorithms to tell them what is “real’.  Please, please realize that we are in a war against the elites over human perception and that social media is a major battleground in that war. Hold on to your critical thinking and skepticism and never surrender it.    .                                                                                                                                                                             

Add Your Heading Text Here