PROTECTOR PARTY – Residents for Joyful Living

Yes, we made excess voting power illegal. Simple. We have not yet made excess wealth power illegal. Simple, and yet never before has excess wealth had so much technical power to control every aspect of our lives, now and in a likely future.

Again putting it simply, this policy confronts plutocracy. A plutocrat is a person who controls extreme or excess wealth and uses it to influence or control society, politically, economically and socially.

Free Enterprise wealth differences supports both economic INCENTIVE and social 'vive la difference', but EXTREMES are unwise, and true Democracy is IMPOSSIBLE with any excess power allowing excess control. No govt. - not even in Ancient Greece - has ever been fully democratic because no govt. over thousands of years, has ever put a cap on excess net worth, to prevent the excess power of plutocrats. But then it took thousands of years before the excess of slavery was voted illegal.

However, it does seem strange does it not, that plutocratic net worth control, is still allowed by govt. to be legal when we are many and the plutocrats are few? WHY?? Perhaps: media, naivety, politician cringe approach of "Let's not talk about it", plutocrat determination, technology limitation - - - ? Anyway, many are NOW very AWARE today of these 2 extreme EFFECTS of this CONTROL:

[a] Social: firstly, an already existing absurdly UNBALANCED distribution of wealth for the meeting of material needs - shelter, health, clean food and water, heat, cooling, child care and education, car, equipment, boat, entertainment - - - ; secondly, today's further unbalancing by the decreasing of our low, medium and high incomes; and thirdly, the EMPATHY DEVOID increasing level of excess poverty and the RIDICULOUS increasing of net worth excess of multi-multi-multi-millionaires, billionaires and trillionaires.

[b] Political: firstly, the ABILITY of plutocrats or wealth elite OLIGARCHS to fund ALL politicians of ALL parties having NO policies against excess net worths, both INTO parliament and to reward them after they LEAVE parliament with rich employment - - if they have served plutocracy well and kept quiet about it.

But secondly and more importantly, the plutocrats are getting more and more frightening CONTROL of new AI devices which are rapidly being used to get more and more CONTROL of us EFFICIENTLY, via: surveillance, speech, language, education, information, shadow banning, digital ID and money, banking, labour, private-Govt. business, data centres, mass immigration-social division-war-postwar construction, child trafficking, gender, drug cartels, medicine, virus creation, injections, food, assassinations - - - - and even more horrifyingly, the predicted SOON ABILITY of net worth elites [Musk, Bezos, Gates, those hidden in Deep State of every country etc] to directly control our PERCEPTION - and hence our BEHAVIOUR - by merging human consciousness with AI access to our MINDS!! We live in a dangerous time. No action time to waste!!

Control of Parliamentary representation and AI must be 'BY the people'!! SO, no more petty policies from Lib-Labs in coalition serving not you but 'the Big End of Town' [see Policy 2.]. Confidently and proudly vote for CANDIDATES who openly and often, VOICE strong support for this policy - and vote weakest supporter last!

SOME FEATURES of this EXCESS WEALTH Policy or True "NEW WORLD ORDER":

1[a] Potential for Australia to be the FIRST Govt. to legally ban Excess Net Worth and to be likely followed globally, like France which had the first Govt. to ban slavery in 1315 and to be followed by other Governments - if slowly. But global communication today is so quick and amazing in our new Technological Age.

[b] We are in a strong position to initiate, or at the very least to publicly promote, this policy at world forums [World Economic Forum], being the richest people in the world in terms of natural resources per capita and in terms of our having sovereign power [& possibly enough pride like Norwegians] to control those abundant resources e.g. minerals, land, sea life. [see Policy 4.]

[c] We can be the first to make this Law of Freedom and the first to begin a global trend with worldwide publicity. We could encourage this trend by trading favourably with those nations who publicly support this law with words and/or action.

[d] After an implementation of this Policy if we become actively aware that much of our natural resources are owned and controlled by foreign plutocrats, we can, like Norway, Iran etc., put this power in the hands of our citizens, privately and publicly.

[e] Citizens would be legally responsible to disclose in the interest of democracy, all prescribed asset values at home and abroad with very long jail sentences for non-disclosure of net worths.

[f] Government and police to have control over ever improving AI technology to assist in their identifying illegal non-disclosure of asset control, alongside their identifying of illegal transfer of money and other assets.

[g] Yes, many strong advantages to benefit EVERYONE in a win-win scenario - any disadvantages or harm to anyone, strong or weak?

2[a] Excess demand on our limited material resources being stopped because of excess wealth not being made available to feed greedy, excess MATERIAL APPETITES for land, mansions; a third private jet plane; food; service; weddings $50mill. to $1billion - - -

[b] Stopping excess material appetites is desirable not only because it helps the appetites of citizens not in excess, it HELPS those citizens losing excess appetites by making their appetites, - material, social [e.g. narcism] and political - less greedy or undesirable.

3. To have only legal wealth, citizens could unload their excess capital ownership to: shareholders, friends, family, charities or our govt. for lowering taxation. Then with no wealth above the Excess threshold, a now rich but non-plutonic citizen can still have INCENTIVE to work and contribute to our society, with no concern for exceeding the excess money threshold under the protection of PHILANTHROPY. or This citizen may be now incentivised to both work and develop more cultural interests.

4. It gives pleasure to those citizens who love a govt. to be a democracy not just 'OF the people', but 'FOR the people' as in [a] Social above, and 'BY the people' as in [b] Political above.

5. It gives pleasure to those citizens who want the requirements in 4. to be in an economy mix of capitalism - free enterprise - socialism, and displeasure to those who want to be in an economy mix of fascism - cartels - oligarchy.

6. It gives pleasure to those who like the financial limitation put on the harm caused by psychopaths and others lacking empathy, like SADISTS and narcissists wielding excess net worth power.

*Excess: i defined as an amount that is too much to be desirable [love/obsession]. ii decided DEMOCRATICALLY e.g. alcohol .05%; car speed 110km/h; waste [EPA] iii perhaps decided to be about $100 million iv no reason why the world would fail or collapse under this excess law. v an extreme poverty line logically relates to an Extreme Wealth line. vi catching murderers and plutocrats is hard, but we don't legalise murder. vii catching plutocrats is easier than catching murderers, paedophiles and sadists. viii if you like excess join those who won't vote against it.