PROTECTOR PARTY
VOTE 1 John CASLEY B. Com. [Univ. of Melb.]
POLICY 1
[Simply, stopping PLUTOCRACY]
" To elect STATE and FEDERAL candidates fearless of plutocrats, who publicly
and strongly, VOICE support for legislation that makes
* Excess WEALTH CONTROL of citizens as illegal as is
Excess VOTING CONTROL of citizens."
Further DETAILS: protectorparty.com Tel. 0400372947 re these DETAILS
POLICY 2
"The power to CONTROL building heights in the suburbs of our citizens to be
transferred by STATE Government to the LOCAL Governments of those citizens".
POLICY 3
"Australia Post to become a competitive Public Bank servicing suburban branches."
POLICY 4
"The return of Victoria's status as a wonderful manufacturing State,
again with sensible protection, basically free of product arriving
on foreign ships from foreign cartelsemploying slave labour."
POLICY 5
"The taxing of imported non-organic food for subsidizing and promoting
the growing of Australian organic food."
POLICY 6
"Non-cringing Govt. expulsion of representatives from regimes guilty of
genocide or racism or war crimes or of assaulting innocent Australians."
POLICY 7
"Reduce immigration by 80%"
DETAILS of Policy 1 [Simply, stopping PLUTOCRACY]
" To elect STATE and FEDERAL candidates fearless of plutocrats, who publicly
and strongly, VOICE support for legislating or promoting that
* Excess WEALTH CONTROL of citizens be as illegal as is Excess VOTING CONTROL of citizens."
Free Enterprise wealth differences supports both INCENTIVE and 'vive la difference',
but EXTREMES are unwise, and true Democracy is IMPOSSIBLE with any excess
power allowing excess control. No govt. - not even in Ancient Greece - has ever been
fully democratic because no govt. over thousands of years, has ever put a cap on
excess net worth, to prevent the excess power of plutocrats. But then it took thousands
of years before the excess of slavery was voted illegal.
However, it does seem strange does it not, that plutocratic net worth control, is still
allowed by govt. to be legal when we are many and the plutocrats are few? WHY??
Perhaps: media, naivety, politicians' cringe, plutocrat determination - - - ? Anyway,
many are NOW very AWARE today of these 2 extreme EFFECTS from this CONTROL:
[a] Social: firstly, an already existing absurdly UNBALANCED distribution of wealth
for the meeting of material needs [housing, health, clean food and water, heat,
child care and education, car, yacht, 'plane, entertainment - - - ];
secondly, today's further unbalancing by the decreasing of our low, medium and high
incomes;
and thirdly, the EMPATHY DEVOID increasing level of excess poverty and the
RIDICULOUS increasing of net worth excess of multi-multi-multi-millionaires,
billionaires and trillionaires.
[b] Political: firstly, the ability of plutocrats or wealth elite OLIGARCHS to fund ALL
politicians and parties having NO policies against excess net worths, both INTO
parliament and to reward them after they LEAVE parliament with rich
employment - - if they have served plutocracy well.
But secondly and more importantly, the plutocrats are getting more
and more frightening CONTROL of an AI which is rapidly getting an ability to get
more and more CONTROL of us EFFICIENTLY, via: surveillance, speech, language,
education, information, shadow banning, digital ID and money, banking, labour,
private-Govt. business, data centres, migration-social division-war-postwar
construction, child trafficking, gender, drug cartels, medicine, virus creation,
injections, food, assassinations - - - -
and even more horrifyingly, the predicted SOON control of our PERCEPTION - and
hence our BEHAVIOUR - by direct access to our MINDS! No action time to waste!!
Control of Parliamentary representation and AI must 'BY the **people'!!
SO, no more petty policies from Lib-Labs in coalition serving not you
but 'the Big End of Town' [see Policy 2.].
Confidently and proudly vote for CANDIDATES who openly and often, VOICE
strong support for this policy - and vote weakest supporter last!
SOME FEATURES of this EXCESS WEALTH Policy or True "NEW WORLD ORDER":
1[a] Potential for Australia to be the FIRST Govt. to legally ban Excess Net Worth
and be followed globally, like France was the first Govt. to [partially] ban slavery
in 1315 and to be followed [very slowly] by other Govts.
[b] We are in a strong position to initiate, or at the very least publicly promote,
this policy, being the richest people in the world in terms of natural resources
per capita and in terms of our having sovereign power [& possibly enough
pride like Norwegians] to control those abundant resources e.g. minerals, land,
sea life. [see Policy 4.]
[c] We can be the first to make this Law of Freedom and the first to begin a global
trend with worldwide publicity. We could encourage this trend by trading favourably
with those nations who publicly support this law with words and/or action.
[d] After an implementation of this Policy we become actively aware that much of
our natural resources are owned and controlled by foreign plutocrats, we can,
like Norway, Iran etc., put this power in the hands of our citizens,
privately and publicly.
2. Excess demand on our limited material resources being stopped because of
excess wealth not being made available to feed excess MATERIAL APPETITES e.g.
a third private jet plane; food; service; weddings $50mill. to $1billion - - -
3. To have only legal wealth, citizens could unload their excess capital ownership to:
shareholders, friends, family, charities or our govt. for lowering taxation.
Then with no wealth above the Excess threshold, the now non-oligarchic citizen
can still have INCENTIVE to work and contribute to our society, with no concern for
exceeding the excess money threshold under the protection of PHILANTHROPY.
4. It gives pleasure to those citizens who love a govt. democracy not just
'OF the people', but 'FOR the people' as in [a] **Social above, and 'BY the people"
as in [b] **Political above.
5. It gives pleasure to those citizens who want the requirements in 4. to be in an
economy mix of capitalism - free enterprise - socialism, and displeasure to those
who want to be in an economy mix of fascism - cartels - oligarchy.
6. It gives pleasure to those who like the financial limitation put on the harm caused
by psychopaths and others lacking empathy, SADISTS and narcissists wielding
excess net worth power.
*Excess:
[a] defined as an amount that is too much to be desirable [love/obsession].
[b] decided democratically e.g. alcohol .05%; car speed 110km/h; waste [EPA]
[c] perhaps decided to be about $100 million
[d] no reason why the world would fail or collapse under this excess law.
[e] an extreme poverty line logically relates to an Extreme Wealth line.
[f] catching murderers and plutocrats is hard, but we don't legalise murder.
[g] and catching plutocrats is easier than catching murderers and sadists.
protectorparty.com Tel. 0400372947
